Table 8 Comparison of SHAP and DT feature selection methods in terms of their AUPRC scores
From: Feature selection strategies: a comparative analysis of SHAP-value and importance-based methods
Size | SHAP-DT | DT | p-value | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
3 | 0.7421 | 0.7323 | 0.4968 | Tie |
5 | 0.7493 | 0.7414 | 0.6293 | Tie |
7 | 0.7594 | 0.7666 | 0.7013 | Tie |
10 | 0.7380 | 0.7686 | 0.2429 | Tie |
15 | 0.7664 | 0.7564 | 0.5058 | Tie |