Table 7 Comparison of SHAP and XGBoost feature selection methods in terms of their AUPRC scores
From: Feature selection strategies: a comparative analysis of SHAP-value and importance-based methods
Size | SHAP-XGBoost | XGBoost | p-value | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
3 | 0.7247 | 0.7727 | 0.0000 | XGBoost |
5 | 0.8165 | 0.7978 | 0.0121 | Tie |
7 | 0.8302 | 0.8255 | 0.5005 | Tie |
10 | 0.8446 | 0.8350 | 0.0041 | SHAP-XGBoost |
15 | 0.8535 | 0.8557 | 0.7097 | Tie |