From: Estimating the carbon content of oceans using satellite sensor data
Author | Main Idea | Limitation |
---|---|---|
Bates et al. [2] | Establish time-series for oceanic carbon levels using in-situ measurements | Data used was biased to spring-season, and relies on seaborne vessels to take measurements |
Zui et al. [66] | Sea surface temperature and Chlorophyll were used to derived POC fluxes | This method did not incorporate salinity data, and the validation of results was done using point in-situ sources |
Dixit et al. [9] | MLR and SVM models were compared at estimating \(p\text {CO}_2\) | In-situ verification of chlorophyll measurements were not performed, and the accuracy was not comparable to previous approaches due to limited longitude |
Liu W. Timothy [36] | An SVM model using SST and SSS to predict sea-surface Carbon fugacity | Large data gaps from MODIS sensors resulted in the authors using significant smoothing to the input data, possibly reducing the model’s ability to capture smaller variations |
Liu and Xie [35] | Carbon dioxide partial pressure was modelled using a linear kernel | The temporal resolution of input data on a yearly-basis was objectively low, with large gaps in the satellite mapping data. Additionally, the authors highlighted the lack of dense, in-situ salinity measurements for model verification |