Table 9 The proposed cost-sensitive method with other methods in term of G.Mean
Dataset | g-mean (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
S-MVML-LA | GMEB | Method proposed | |
Iris | 85.49 (3) | 96.05 (2) | 97.30 (1) |
Cancer | 96.33 (1) | 94.98 (3) | 96.22 (2) |
Ionosphere | 85.79 (3) | 90.50 (1) | 87.88 (2) |
Wine | 90.62 (3) | 97.16(2) | 98.85 (1) |
Pid | 0 (3) | 75.74(2) | 76.41 (1) |
Wdbc | 99.26 (1) | 95.92 (3) | 97.51 (2) |
Musk | 85.71 (2) | 81.06(3) | 87.54 (1) |
Dermatology-6 | 79.85 (3) | 98.13 (2) | 99.70 (1) |
FuelCons | 60.23 (3) | 84.53 (2) | 86.50 (1) |
Movement_libras | 53.70 (3) | 85.06(2) | 85.43 (1) |
Sonar | 78.90(3) | 78.90 (2) | 84.67 (1) |
SPECTF | 50(2.5) | 50 (2.5) | 75.93 (1) |
Mnist | 87.29 (3) | 94.94 (2) | 95.42 (1) |
Colon | 81.63(2) | 67.88 (3) | 82.55 (1) |
Caltch101 | 70.12 (1) | 66.09 (3) | 68.26 (2) |
DLBCL77 | 50 (3) | 82.70 (2) | 95.50(1) |
Kddcup-rootkit-imap-vs-back | 57.13(3) | 99.97 (1) | 99.97 (1) |
Kddcup-buffer-overflow-vs-back | 79.22 (3) | 100 (1) | 100 (1) |
Kddcup-guess-passwd-vs-satan | 81.15 (3) | 96.73 (2) | 100 (1) |
Kddcup-land-vs-satan | 77.74 (3) | 100 (1) | 100 (1) |
Cleveland | 0 (3) | 32.97 (2) | 40.51 (1) |
Average rank | 2.59 | 2.09 | 1.23 |