Table 2 Comparison of the proposed method with Two-stream Convolutional Networks method
| Â | Two-stream convolutional networks method | Proposed method | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best | Worst | Average | Best | Worst | Average | |
Sensitivity (%) | 84.73 | 80.48 | 83.71 | 86.09 | 81.92 | 85.23 |
Specificity (%) | 86.73 | 83.32 | 85.69 | 87.15 | 83.69 | 86.75 |
Classification (%) | 85.59 | 81.32 | 84.44 | 86.39 | 82.54 | 85.67 |