Table 1 Performance comparison of GB, CB, and CLB
No of data | Performance measures | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
\(p_{s}\) | \(r_{k}\) | |||||
GB | CB | CLB | GB | CB | CLB | |
a | ||||||
1000 | 86.3266 | 87.9988 | 95.4534 | 92.4555 | 92.1125 | 96.1128 |
2000 | 88.3226 | 88.3322 | 96.6644 | 91.8857 | 90.3534 | 95.3534 |
3000 | 87.2247 | 88.1244 | 97.4354 | 92.2333 | 91.2324 | 96.2324 |
4000 | 86.3577 | 86.3365 | 95.3422 | 90.8837 | 92.8323 | 95.8323 |
5000 | 88.3447 | 88.8455 | 96.4555 | 91.8876 | 90.8322 | 96.8322 |
No of data | Performance measures | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
\(f_{s}\) | \(a_{c}\) | |||||
GB | CB | CLB | GB | CB | CLB | |
b | ||||||
1000 | 90.3324 | 91.0455 | 95.0455 | 96.8543 | 89.7764 | 95.7764 |
2000 | 90.5688 | 90.1454 | 94.1454 | 86.76454 | 90.8845 | 96.8875 |
3000 | 91.4788 | 90.8807 | 93.8875 | 86.97552 | 89.3445 | 96.3447 |
4000 | 90.3357 | 91.1043 | 95.1435 | 85.67556 | 89.7764 | 95.7761 |
5000 | 91.6355 | 90.8541 | 96.8543 | 86.67845 | 90.6654 | 96.6654 |