Skip to main content
# Table 6 Details of the features

Feature | Details | Type |
---|---|---|

F1 | ||

\(fposD\left( {wup} \right)\) | Average positive value of review document where Wu and Palmer is employed as similarity algorithm | Sentence level features (SLF) |

F2 | ||

\(fnegD\left( {wup} \right)\) | Average negative value of review document where Wu and Palmer is employed as similarity algorithm | |

F3 | ||

\(fneuD\left( {wup} \right)\) | Average neutral value of review document where Wu and Palmer is employed as similarity algorithm | |

F4 | ||

\(fposD\left( {jcn} \right)\) | Average positive value of review document where Jiang and Conrath is employed as similarity algorithm | |

F5 | ||

\(fnegD\left( {jcn} \right)\) | Average negative value of review document where Jiang and Conrath is employed as similarity algorithm | |

F6 | ||

\(fneuD\left( {jcn} \right)\) | Average neutral value of review document where Jiang and Conrath is employed as similarity algorithm | |

F7 | ||

\(fposD\left( {lch} \right)\) | Average positive value of review document where Leacock and Chodorow is employed as similarity algorithm | |

F8 | ||

\(fnegD\left( {lch} \right)\) | Average negative value of review document where Leacock and Chodorow is employed as similarity algorithm | |

F9 | ||

\(fneuD\left( {lch} \right)\) | Average neutral value of review document where Leacock and Chodorow is employed as similarity algorithm | |

F10 | ||

\(fposD\left( {res} \right)\) | Average positive value of review document where Resnik is employed as similarity algorithm | |

F11 | ||

\(fnegD\left( {res} \right)\) | Average negative value of review document where Resnik is employed as similarity algorithm | |

F12 | ||

\(fneuD\left( {res} \right)\) | Average neutral value of review document where Resnik is employed as similarity algorithm | |

F13 | ||

\(fposD\left( {lin} \right)\) | Average positive value of review document where Lin is employed as similarity algorithm | |

F14 | ||

\(fnegD\left( {lin} \right)\) | Average negative value of review document where Lin is employed as similarity algorithm | |

F15 | ||

\(fneuD\left( {lin} \right)\) | Average neutral value of review document where Lin is employed as similarity algorithm | |

F16 | ||

\(fxD\left( {wup} \right)\) | Average \(x\) value of review document where Wu and Palmer is employed as similarity algorithm | Domain sensitive features (DSF) |

F17 | ||

\(fyD\left( {wup} \right)\) | Average \(y\) value of review document where Wu and Palmer is employed as similarity algorithm | |

F18 | ||

\(fxD\left( {jcn} \right)\) | Average \(x\) value of review document where Jiang and Conrath is employed as similarity algorithm | |

F19 | ||

\(fyD\left( {jcn} \right)\) | Average \(y\) value of review document where Jiang and Conrath is employed as similarity algorithm | |

F20 | ||

\(fxD\left( {lch} \right)\) | Average \(x\) value of review document where Leacock and Chodorow is employed as similarity algorithm | |

F21 | ||

\(fyD\left( {lch} \right)\) | Average \(y\) value of review document where Leacock and Chodorow is employed as similarity algorithm | |

F22 | ||

\(fxD\left( {res} \right)\) | Average \(x\) value of review document where Resnik is employed as similarity algorithm | |

F23 | ||

\(fyD\left( {res} \right)\) | Average \(y\) value of review document where Resnik is employed as similarity algorithm | |

F24 | ||

\(fxD\left( {lin} \right)\) | Average \(x\) value of review document where Lin is employed as similarity algorithm | |

F25 | ||

\(fyD\left( {lin} \right)\) | Average \(y\) value of review document where Lin is employed as similarity algorithm |