Table 6 Details of the features
Feature | Details | Type |
|---|---|---|
F1 | ||
\(fposD\left( {wup} \right)\) | Average positive value of review document where Wu and Palmer is employed as similarity algorithm | Sentence level features (SLF) |
F2 | ||
\(fnegD\left( {wup} \right)\) | Average negative value of review document where Wu and Palmer is employed as similarity algorithm | |
F3 | ||
\(fneuD\left( {wup} \right)\) | Average neutral value of review document where Wu and Palmer is employed as similarity algorithm | |
F4 | ||
\(fposD\left( {jcn} \right)\) | Average positive value of review document where Jiang and Conrath is employed as similarity algorithm | |
F5 | ||
\(fnegD\left( {jcn} \right)\) | Average negative value of review document where Jiang and Conrath is employed as similarity algorithm | |
F6 | ||
\(fneuD\left( {jcn} \right)\) | Average neutral value of review document where Jiang and Conrath is employed as similarity algorithm | |
F7 | ||
\(fposD\left( {lch} \right)\) | Average positive value of review document where Leacock and Chodorow is employed as similarity algorithm | |
F8 | ||
\(fnegD\left( {lch} \right)\) | Average negative value of review document where Leacock and Chodorow is employed as similarity algorithm | |
F9 | ||
\(fneuD\left( {lch} \right)\) | Average neutral value of review document where Leacock and Chodorow is employed as similarity algorithm | |
F10 | ||
\(fposD\left( {res} \right)\) | Average positive value of review document where Resnik is employed as similarity algorithm | |
F11 | ||
\(fnegD\left( {res} \right)\) | Average negative value of review document where Resnik is employed as similarity algorithm | |
F12 | ||
\(fneuD\left( {res} \right)\) | Average neutral value of review document where Resnik is employed as similarity algorithm | |
F13 | ||
\(fposD\left( {lin} \right)\) | Average positive value of review document where Lin is employed as similarity algorithm | |
F14 | ||
\(fnegD\left( {lin} \right)\) | Average negative value of review document where Lin is employed as similarity algorithm | |
F15 | ||
\(fneuD\left( {lin} \right)\) | Average neutral value of review document where Lin is employed as similarity algorithm | |
F16 | ||
\(fxD\left( {wup} \right)\) | Average \(x\) value of review document where Wu and Palmer is employed as similarity algorithm | Domain sensitive features (DSF) |
F17 | ||
\(fyD\left( {wup} \right)\) | Average \(y\) value of review document where Wu and Palmer is employed as similarity algorithm | |
F18 | ||
\(fxD\left( {jcn} \right)\) | Average \(x\) value of review document where Jiang and Conrath is employed as similarity algorithm | |
F19 | ||
\(fyD\left( {jcn} \right)\) | Average \(y\) value of review document where Jiang and Conrath is employed as similarity algorithm | |
F20 | ||
\(fxD\left( {lch} \right)\) | Average \(x\) value of review document where Leacock and Chodorow is employed as similarity algorithm | |
F21 | ||
\(fyD\left( {lch} \right)\) | Average \(y\) value of review document where Leacock and Chodorow is employed as similarity algorithm | |
F22 | ||
\(fxD\left( {res} \right)\) | Average \(x\) value of review document where Resnik is employed as similarity algorithm | |
F23 | ||
\(fyD\left( {res} \right)\) | Average \(y\) value of review document where Resnik is employed as similarity algorithm | |
F24 | ||
\(fxD\left( {lin} \right)\) | Average \(x\) value of review document where Lin is employed as similarity algorithm | |
F25 | ||
\(fyD\left( {lin} \right)\) | Average \(y\) value of review document where Lin is employed as similarity algorithm | |