Skip to main content

Table 8 Test metric results for each semantic segmentation method for the Botswana and Houston datasets while employing patching for different patch sizes. For TCNN-E-ILS T = 20. An explanation of the metrics can be found in "Experiment configurations" section

From: CEU-Net: ensemble semantic segmentation of hyperspectral images using clustering

Patch

Methods

OA

AA

Kappa

OA

AA

Kappa

  

Botswana (k=3)

Houston (k=2)

 

HybridSN

99.88 ± 0.15

99.89 ± 0.15

99.87 ± 0.15

98.28 ± 0.1

98.18 ± 0.1

98.19 ± 0.1

5 x 5

U-Net

98.65 ± 0.15

98.97 ± 0.15

98.65 ± 0.15

98.30 ± 0.1

98.34 ± 0.1

98.21 ± 0.1

 

CEU-Net

97.54 ± 0.15

97.81 ± 0.15

97.34 ± 0.15

94.47 ± 0.1

95.02 ± 0.1

94.02 ± 0.1

 

HybridSN

98.89 ± 0.15

98.97 ± 0.15

98.79 ± 0.15

97.5 ± 0.1

97.30 ± 0.1

96.30 ± 0.1

10 x 10

U-Net

97.92 ± 0.15

98.02 ± 0.15

97.97 ± 0.15

97.78 ± 0.1

97.69 ± 0.1

96.52 ± 0.1

 

CEU-Net

96.57 ± 0.15

96.45 ± 0.15

96.44 ± 0.15

97.92 ± 0.1

96.54 ± 0.1

96.34 ± 0.1

 

HybridSN

97.41 ± 0.15

97.55 ± 0.15

97.19 ± 0.15

98.05 ± 0.1

98.11 ± 0.1

97.89 ± 0.1

15 x 15

U-Net

90.88 ± 0.15

91.34 ± 0.15

90.1 ± 0.15

94.95 ± 0.1

95.51 ± 0.1

94.54 ± 0.1

 

CEU-Net

91.38 ± 0.15

91.55 ± 0.2

90.66 ± 0.2

93.94 ± 0.1

94.01 ± 0.1

92.97 ± 0.1

33 x 33

TCNN-E-ILS

N/A

N/A

N/A

88.33 ± 0.68

88.10 ± 0.86

87.39 ± 0.74

  1. Highest performing values are highlighted in bold