Table 8 The proposed cost-sensitive method with other methods in term of PRC
Dataset | PRC (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
S-MVML-LA | GMEB | Method proposed | |
Iris | 79.86 (3) | 95.61 (1) | 95.14 (2) |
Cancer | 96.23 (1) | 94.83 (3) | 95.86 (2) |
Ionosphere | 67.77 (3) | 80.13 (2) | 82.31 (1) |
1Wine | 81.90 (3) | 96.49 (2) | 98.19 (1) |
Pid | 49.89 (3) | 71.01 (2) | 71.42 (1) |
Wdbc | 86.69 (3) | 93.46 (2) | 96.20 (1) |
Musk | 84.55 (2) | 80.06 (3) | 87.95 (1) |
Dermatology-6 | 70 (3) | 95 (1) | 88.33 (2) |
FuelCons | 56.12 (3) | 65.67 (2) | 68.82 (1) |
Movement_libras | 47.49 (3) | 76.60(2) | 79.40 (1) |
Sonar | 78.90(2) | 78.90 (2) | 84.67 (1) |
SPECTF | 50(2.5) | 50 (2) | 75.93 (1) |
Mnist | 76.15 (3) | 89.74 (2) | 91.55 (1) |
Colon | 84.29 (2) | 84.50 (1) | 84.29 (2) |
Caltch101 | 46.84 (2) | 45.26 (3) | 48.25 (1) |
DLBCL77 | 50 (3) | 82.70 (2) | 95.50(1) |
Kddcup-rootkit-imap-vs-back | 68.01(3) | 98 (1) | 95 (2) |
Kddcup-buffer-overflow-vs-back | 79.27 (3) | 100 (1) | 100 (1) |
Kddcup-guess-passwd-vs-satan | 90.65 (3) | 99.90 (2) | 100 (1) |
Kddcup-land-vs-satan | 80.93 (3) | 100 (1) | 100 (1) |
Cleveland | 20 (3) | 28.65 (2) | 31.79 (1) |
Average Rank | 2.69 | 1.95 | 1.30 |