Table 7 The proposed cost-sensitive method with other methods in term of RCL
Dataset | RCL (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
S-MVML-LA | GMEB | Proposed cost sensitive | |
Iris | 84.40 (3) | 95.14 (2) | 96.52 (1) |
Cancer | 96.28 (1) | 94.90 (3) | 96.02 (2) |
Ionosphere | 68.14 (3) | 82.37 (2) | 83.97 (1) |
Wine | 90.04 (3) | 96.49 (2) | 98.55 (1) |
Pid | 32.52 (3) | 71.01 (2) | 76.55 (1) |
Wdbc | 92.54 (3) | 92.55 (2) | 96.00 (1) |
Musk | 85.75 (2) | 81.19 (3) | 87.69 (1) |
Dermatology-6 | 98.15 (1) | 98.15 (1) | 89.85 (3) |
FuelCons | 54.29 (3) | 77.67 (2) | 80.88 (1) |
Movement_libras | 44.70 (3) | 79.72(1) | 79.04 (2) |
Sonar | 82.35 (3) | 86.99 (2) | 85.41 (1) |
SPECTF | 39.69 (2) | 39.69 (2) | 67.38 (1) |
Mnist | 79.28 (3) | 91.00 (2) | 91.84 (1) |
Colon | 82.63 (2) | 71.71 (3) | 83.21 (1) |
Caltch101 | 56.67 (1) | 50.14 (3) | 52.69 (2) |
DLBCL77 | 37.66 (3) | 78.94 (2) | 98.32(1) |
Kddcup-rootkit-imap-vs-back | 71.92 (3) | 99.97 (1) | 99.97 (1) |
Kddcup-buffer-overflow-vs-back | 82.03 (3) | 100 (1) | 100 (1) |
Kddcup-guess-passwd-vs-satan | 83.68 (3) | 96.83 (2) | 100 (1) |
Kddcup-land-vs-satan | 80.93 (3) | 100 (1) | 100 (1) |
Cleveland | 10.82 (3) | 22.34 (2) | 30.63 (1) |
Average rank | 2.61 | 2.04 | 1.30 |