Skip to main content

Table 1 Accuracy comparison of existing IDS systems and Our Model (TP-IDS)

From: Highly accurate and efficient two phase-intrusion detection system (TP-IDS) using distributed processing of HADOOP and machine learning techniques

Sr. No.

IDS system

Accuracy (%)

1.

IDS using SVM [7]

93.85

2.

IDS using GRU-SVM [11]

89.30

3.

IDS using LibSVM [13]

98.64

4.

IDS using CAIDM [14]

89.02

5.

IDS using PCA-FC-kNN [18]

94.00

6.

IDS using BC-kNN [19]

94.92

7.

IDS using WSN-kNN [20]

89.90

8.

IDS using random forest [22]

93.00

9.

IDS using decision tree [23]

89.56

10.

IDS using naïve Bayes [24]

95.00

11.

IDS using PCA and naïve Bayes [25]

83.00

12.

IDS using MABC-PSO [27]

98.67

13.

IDS using deep learning [30] (for known attacks only)

99.77

14.

IDS using ANN [28]

77.48

15.

IDS using ANN [29] (For known attacks only)

99.25

16.

Our Model: TP-IDS

99.93