Table 6 Comparison with Previous Research
Paper | Dataset | Method | Accuracy | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 class | 3 class | 4 class | 6 class | |||
Werteni et al. [22] | MITBPD | ELM | 78.33% | – | – | – |
BPNN | 76.74% | – | – | – | ||
SVM | 78.12% | – | – | – | ||
Adnane et al. [20] | MITBPD | SVM (12 features) | 79.31% | – | – | – |
SVM (10 features) | 79.99% | – | – | – | ||
Xiao et al. [21] | SHRSV | Random Forest (41 features) | – | 88.67% | – | – |
Yücelbaş et al. [29] | SHRSV | Morphological | – | 77.02% | – | – |
Wei et al. [30] | PSG | DNN | – | 77% | – | – |
Our paper | MITBPD | ELM and PSO | 82.1% | 76.77% | 71.52% | 62.66% |