Table 4 Results of criteria evaluated in the proposed method (in percentage)
| Â | TN | FN | FP | TP | ACC | AUC | Recall | Specificity | Precision | Precision | F-measure |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Without selected features | |||||||||||
 First scenario | 99 | 3 | 5 | 173 | 97.143 | 99.845 | 98.295 | 95.192 | 98.44 | 93.868 | 98.367 |
 Second scenario | 75 | 6 | 2 | 127 | 96.19 | 99.22 | 95.489 | 97.403 | 97.19 | 91.962 | 96.331 |
 Third scenario | 40 | 3 | 3 | 94 | 95.714 | 99.315 | 96.907 | 93.023 | 96.90 | 89.930 | 96.903 |
With selected features | |||||||||||
 First scenario | 98 | 3 | 6 | 173 | 96.143 | 97.362 | 98.295 | 94.231 | 96.64 | 93.100 | 97.460 |
 Second scenario | 73 | 5 | 4 | 128 | 95.714 | 98.071 | 96.241 | 94.805 | 96.96 | 90.802 | 96.599 |
 Third scenario | 43 | 0 | 0 | 97 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |