Table 14 Average F-measure of different state-of-the-art under-sampling and over-sampling methods as compared with the proposed approach
Name | BIDC1 [51] | BIDC2 [51] | K-US [50] | NB-Rec [49] | DB_US [48] | Proposed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ecoli2 | 0.81 | 0.83 | 0.59 | 0.91 | 0.96 | 0.90 ± 0.142 |
ecoli3 | NA | NA | 0.71 | 0.63 | 0.71 | 0.86 ± 0.195 |
glass0 | 0.63 | 0.66 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.79 ± 0.116 |
new-thyroid1 | NA | NA | 0.73 | 0.92 | 1.00 | 0.89 ± 0.206 |
Pima | NA | NA | 0.73 | 0.58 | 0.71 | 0.63 ± 0.086 |
segment0 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.98 ± 0.017 |
wisconsin | NA | NA | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.95 ± 0.053 |
Average F-measure | 0.81(4) | 0.83(3) | 0.74(6) | 0.80(5) | 0.85(2) | 0.86(1) |