Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison of proposed model with the state-of-art deep learning models using the NEU-CLS dataset

From: Contrastive self-supervised representation learning framework for metal surface defect detection

Model

Architectures

Trainable parameters

Accuracy (%)

F1-score

Qayyum et al. [63]

InceptionV3

24 M

92.96

0.93

Konovalenko et al. [64]

ResNet152

60 M

86.29

0.86

Zeeshan et al. [65]

VGG19

138 M

61.85

0.55

Singh et al. [66]

ResNet101-SVM

44.5 M

70.23

0.70

Liu et. al. [28]

CNN-LSTM

1.2 M

67.5

0.68

Lee et. al [67]

AnoViT

13.97 M

93.0

0.93

Proposed

SimCLR-Skip-ConvNet

0.9 M

97.41

0.97