Skip to main content

Table 10 Model performance on two subgroups in the 1A dataset

From: Hypert: hypernymy-aware BERT with Hearst pattern exploitation for hypernym discovery

Subgroup

Evaluation

measures

Proposed

method

RMM

SPON

Prompting

BERT

(is a)

Prompting

BERT

(such as)

Person

MRR

84.78 ± 5.48

60.88 ± 17.54

66.83 ± 16.51

21.16 ± 1.22

17.08 ± 1.00

MAP

45.78 ± 1.50

38.37 ± 5.31

38.82 ± 5.58

13.68 ± 0.47

11.01 ± 0.68

P@1

79.34 ± 7.94

49.51 ± 21.90

55.01 ± 19.68

10.32 ± 1.23

8.50 ± 1.09

P@3

44.82 ± 1.72

34.92 ± 8.61

36.53 ± 8.61

10.38 ± 0.58

8.24 ± 0.75

P@5

40.88 ± 1.36

34.45 ± 5.77

34.92 ± 5.83

11.88 ± 0.42

8.60 ± 0.71

P@15

45.04 ± 1.54

41.16 ± 2.79

40.33 ± 2.77

17.02 ± 0.58

15.34 ± 0.73

Computer- Software

MRR

36.69 ± 4.71

24.37 ± 3.49

17.01 ± 3.96

17.25 ± 3.19

19.52 ± 2.85

MAP

21.75 ± 2.13

14.58 ± 3.01

8.36 ± 2.23

7.01 ± 1.46

8.31 ± 1.14

P@1

22.53 ± 5.64

13.03 ± 3.13

7.94 ± 3.28

11.12 ± 2.35

11.59 ± 2.64

P@3

19.44 ± 2.71

12.58 ± 2.72

6.89 ± 2.44

7.22 ± 1.39

8.68 ± 1.32

P@5

20.09 ± 2.31

13.38 ± 3.29

6.89 ± 2.01

6.98 ± 1.44

7.97 ± 1.20

P@15

25.55 ± 2.15

17.83 ± 4.44

10.91 ± 2.57

6.48 ± 1.42

7.97 ± 1.21

  1. Bold indicates the best performance across the comparison models