Table 3 Improvement of eBF over Standard Bloom Filter, Cuckoo Filter, and robustBF for 100Â M dataset
From: eBF: an enhanced Bloom Filter for intrusion detection in IoT
Comparison with | eBF memory and time efficiency advantage | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Â | Memory efficiency | Insertion speed | Similar searching | Mixed searching | Disjoint searching |
StandardBF | \(15.6\times\) | \(5\times\) | \(3.45\times\) | \(3.33\times\) | \(3.45\times\) |
CuckooFilter | \(13\times\) | \(1.25\times\) | \(1.03\times\) | \(1.25\times\) | \(1.69\times\) |
robustBF | \(8\times\) | \(1.28\times\) | \(1.03\times\) | \(1.11\times\) | \(1.31\times\) |