Skip to main content

Table 4 List of the analyzed sample, the CNN algorithm type, tested data (sound or image samples), and their significant findings for the publications that have been surveyed

From: A review on lung disease recognition by acoustic signal analysis with deep learning networks

Study

Method

Splitting strategy

Performance

Specificity

Sensitivity

Accuracy

Score

Demir et al. [42, 43]

VGG16

Tenfold CV

63.09%

Serbes et al. [144]

SVM

Official 60/40

-

49.86%

Sen I, et al. [143]

GMM Classifier

90%

90%

85.00%

Saraiva et al. [141]

CNN

Random 70/30

74.3%

Yang et al. [172]

ResNet + SE + SA

Official 60/40

81.25%

17.84%

49.55%

Ma et al. [101]

bi-ResNet

Official 60/40

Random tenfold CV

69.20%

80.06%

31.12%

58.54%

52.79%

67.44%

50.16%

69.30%

Pham et al. [130]

CNN-MoE

Official 60/40

Random

fivefold CV

68%

90%

26%

68%

47%

97%

Gairola et al. [55] official 60/40

CNN

Official 60/40

Interpatient 80/20

72.3%

83.3%

40.1%

53.7%

56.2% 68.5%

Liu et al. [91, 95]

CNN

Random 75/25

81.62%

Acharya and Basu [3]

CNN-RNN

interpatient 80/20

84.14%

48.63%

66.38%

Allahwardi & Altan et al. [14]

Deep Belief Networks (DBN)

93.65%

73.33%

93.34%

67.22%

95.84%

70.28%

 

Kochetov et al. [80]

RNN

Interpatient

fivefold CV

73%

58.4%

65.7%

Minami et al. [109]

CNN

Official 60/40

81%

28%

54%

Georgios Petmezas et al. [129]

CNN-LSTM with FL

Interpatient tenfold CV

LOOCV

84.26%

52.78%

60.29%

76.39%

74.57%

68.52%

Chambres et al. [31]

HMM

SVM

Official 60/40

56.69%

77.80%

42.32%

48.90%

49.50%

49.98%

39.37%

49.86%

Oweis et al. [122]

ANN

100%

97.8%

98.3%

Jakovljevi´c and Lonˇcar-Turukalo [73]

HMM

Official 60/40

-

39.56%

Bahoura [22]

GMM

92.8%

43.7%

80.00%

Emmanouilidou D et al. [46]

RBF SVM

Classifier

86.55 (± 0.36)

86.82 (± 0.42)

86.70%

Ma et al. [98,99,100]

ResNet + NL

Official 60/40

Interpatient fivefold CV

63.20%

64.73%

41.32%

63.69%

64.21%

52.26%

Nangia et al. [21]

CNN

94.24%

93.6%

Pramono RX et al. [4]

SVM

83.86%

82.06%

87.18%

82.67%

Nguyen and Pernkopf [118]

ResNet

Official 60/40

Official 60/40

79.34%

82.46%

47.37%

37.24%

73.69%

58.29% 64.92%

Bardou D et al. [23]

CNN

95.56%

Aykanat M et al. [18]

ANN

86%

86%

76.00%

Chamberlain et al. [30]

0.56

86% Wheeze