Skip to main content

Table 2 MAE metric for the best models for every window size and dataset tested

From: A new deep learning architecture with inductive bias balance for transformer oil temperature forecasting

Dataset

Window

ARIMA

Informera

CNNa

HLNet

NBEATS

SCINet

SRCNet

ETTh1

24

0.290

0.247

0.172 (±0.030)

0.197 (±0.014)

0.201 ( ±0.012)

\(\underline{0.186 (\pm 0.006)}\)

0.1380.010)

48

 

\(\underline{0.167(\pm 0.015)}\)

0.193 (±0.019)

0.210 (±0.043)

0.166 (±0.021)

0.1370.006)

72

 

\(\underline{0.139 (\pm 0.013)}\)

0.202 (±0.007)

0.152 (±0.009)

0.149 (±0.013)

0.1310.003)

96

 

\(\underline{0.144 (\pm 0.007)}\)

0.205 (±0.014)

0.149 (±0.013)

0.146 (±0.010)

*0.129 (±0.001)

120

 

0.156 (±0.012)

0.192 (±0.007)

0.15 (±0.018)

*0.138 (±0.010)

0.1310.004)

ETTh2

24

0.433

0.240

0.205 (±0.008)

0.333 (±0.016)

0.1970.003)

\(\underline{0.198 (\pm 0.006)}\)

\(\underline{0.198 (\pm 0.006)}\)

48

 

\(\underline{0.198 (\pm 0.002)}\)

0.339 (±0.011)

0.201 (±0.003)

0.201 (±0.009)

0.1950.005)

72

 

0.1950.004)

0.334 (±0.010)

0.202 (±0.002)

0.196 (±0.009)

0.1890.003)

96

 

0.200 (±0.005)

0.338 (±0.003)

0.207 (±0.003)

\(\underline{0.197 (\pm 0.004)}\)

*0.193 0.002)

120

 

0.201 (±0.005)

0.339 (±0.004)

0.206 (±0.002)

\(\underline{0.198 (\pm 0.004)}\)

0.1940.005)

  1. aThese results have been obtained from the Liu et al. work. Note that the concept of input window does not exists in ARIMA, which explains why there are repeated values in each window. In addition, randomness does not affect ARIMA which justifies there is no standard deviation